“Take Up Your Guns Daily, and Follow Me”: The Problem with Christian Rights

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Let’s be honest, guns are easier to carry than crosses.

Christians across America are taking to Facebook and lighting up the Twitterverse in response to President Obama’s proposal that introduced the most substantial gun control reform in decades. As plagued as social media may be, those who proclaim to follow Jesus have expressed their varied opinions and faithful concerns through intense arguments, devotional writings, and a frenzy of blog posts. Among the pro-gun control plaintiff’s concerns is the argument that they have rights and that a firmer gun control policy will violate their constitutional privileges.

We Americans are always prepared to reiterate the fact that we have rights: you have the right to defend yourself from someone mugging you; you have the legal right to own a gun; there is an inherent right for every human to express their freedom of speech, even at the expense of others. These are your “God-given” constitutional rights, as we like to say. So maybe we should be angry if President Obama is trying to take away, or impose more strict laws upon, your guns.

From a Christian point of view, the talk about “rights” – the right to own a gun, or the right to do this or that – is problematic. First, along the lines of the Sermon on the Mount (Matt 5-7), Christ beckons us to give up our rights. Christ says when someone slaps you on the cheek, offer them the other one; when someone sues you in court for your coat, give them your cloak also; and when a Roman soldier asks you to walk a mile with their luggage (which was a Roman law imposed upon Jews), sacrifice your right to stop after only one mile and walk with them two. Furthermore, and maybe the most compelling, are Christ’s words in Luke 9:23. After addressing his disciples on his suffering and death to come, Jesus proclaims, “If any want to become my disciples, let them deny themselves and take up their cross daily and follow me” (Luke 9:23; NRSV). In other words, to follow Jesus means to give up the securities of daily life; forgo the riches and give to the poor; to leave your personal convictions behind and to look forward to an inverted world where only love and compassion make sense.

In light of these scriptures and the message of love that makes up the fabric of the entire biblical narrative, rights have little say, if any, in the life of Christian disciples. Christians in the early church had the right to not be fed to lions, but they willfully walked into the coliseum and met death with a kiss. Saint Peter had the right to be crucified like everyone else, but instead he felt unworthy of dying the death of Christ and chose to be crucified upside-down. Christianity urges us to give up our own rights as a witness to others, and as an imitation of our Lord. If anything, Christianity is the voluntary surrendering of rights and the acceptance of the counter-cultural understanding of the first being last, and the last first; of losing your life to find it.

Whereas rights connote a boundary or a zone that citizens possesses and others should not breach, Christianity suggests an openness to relationships that violate and transverse these very boundaries and securities in the name of love. In this way, we can experience what makes someone essentially human, not constitutionally American. When Christianity comes into contact with the political sphere (and it should), it is not that Christianity lives by an apolitical mantra that produces the quietist, “stay where you are and be happy,” mentality. On the contrary, The Christian faith produces another politic, a counter or inverted politic, that engages the real world, which includes real people and deals with authentic problems.

In all the muddiness with the interaction between faith and public life, Christians should always struggle to read the scriptures with sensitivity to the tensions that emerge, while also attempting to remain faithful to the difficult task of following Jesus in our contemporary setting. Certainly, taking into account the situation of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement, or the effect the issue of human trafficking has on the discussion of rights, leaves us with more questions to ponder and only deepens the difficulty of being a conscientious cross-bearer. We should always be reminded that the task of theology and discipleship is never finished.

The weight of a gun and the security it brings are far more appealing than being crucified. Guns protect those we love and hold dear to us. It is our American right to own a gun. However, there is no such thing as a Christian right to bear arms.

Gun Control, Jesus, and the Family

Tags

, , , , , , ,

_Full_candle_Candle_light_4010In the wake of the tragedy in Newtown Connecticut, I have been overwhelmed at amount of discussion on gun control and the courage of human beings to severely attack Barack Obama for trying to “take away their guns.” Let us be clear – Obama is trying to ban assault weapons and make it more difficult for people to get a registered handgun or other type of firearm. For all those who are freaking out: Obama is not going to come into your house and take the guns out of your closet or gun safe. You will still be able to shoot your deer and protect yourself. Calm down. I find it funny that it was harder for me to get my marriage licenses than it would be for me to buy a semi-automatic rifle; the last time I checked, my wife is not a deadly weapon that could be used to kill innocent people (please forgo the jokes).

Also, I have yet to hear anyone in Sandy Hook come out and advocate against stricter gun control laws. What’s more, no pro-gun rights senators would go on major broadcasting networks and discuss their opinions this week. This silence is important and Americans should pay attention to how the people closest to the tragedy are reacting. The majority of the people speaking out against gun control have nothing to do with the victims and are just separated enough from the massacre to post pro-gun Facebook statuses and such, while still seeming to have bit of grief for the victims. What they are really saying is, “ I am sad for these people, but this has nothing to do with me and my guns, so keep your hands off them. I am not saying these are not genuine people and statues; the fact that I am writing this post shows that I am, in some way, separated enough to comment on this tragedy myself. Does this situation have nothing to do with you and I?

The immediate families and friends of these children, I suspect, have a very different view on gun control post-Sandy Hook. Why is this? We state our opinions and try to be objective, but I am sure in Sandy Hook today there are few objective people. If anything, we need a little more subjectivity and personal interaction with political issues these days.

I am reminded of The Gospel of Matthew’s account of Jesus speaking about family. While Jesus is inside of a house, some people come to him and tell him his mother and brothers are outside and want to talk to him. Jesus answers,  “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” And pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” This is a dynamic family model Jesus is speaking of.

Christianity gives us the unique opportunity to treat others like they are a part of our own family, even when they are a different race, nationality, or we down right hate them. What this implicates is that those very kids who were massacred were our own kids; the parents who are mourning today in Connecticut are our mothers, fathers, and grandparents. There is no objectivity along these lines. If Christians would take the words of Christ seriously, if people would realize that Jesus destroys an objective view of the family, then, I believe some of us would have a very different view on gun control considering it was your own kids who were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School. In Christ, our immediate family is stretched out to all people. So in some mysterious way, we should experience this tragedy as if it happened in our own towns, in our own households. For sure, we have to be sensitive when talking like this, because God only knows that the pain those Newtown parents and family members are feeling is unimaginable to me. But we also have to admit that something transformative happens when we are brought under Christ’s spirit.

We now have the unique opportunity discuss these issues in a serious manner, taking into account all of the pain and loss in the last year. I cannot expect people to let go of their opinions and pro-gun rights rants, but I do believe that Christianity beckons us to remember that when we talk about the people who were murdered at Sandy Hook, we are talking about our own children, friends, and relatives.

And for those who use the ever-so popular argument, “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people,” you are right: Guns don’t kill people. Guns kill your children and your mothers and your brothers.

Things I am Working on . . .

Tags

, , , , , ,

It has been a good minute since I have posted, due to the fact that Josh Barfield met his infamous “divinity school workload.” Nonetheless, I figured I would at least state some of the things I am studying and interest me lately:

1. I really want to have a good reason to read Hegel‘s Phenomenology of Spirit. I am having a hard time finding a good reason to take on mass confusion.

2. I am taking a class on Frantz Fanon which outlines colonialism and its effect on seeing the other. As we deal with racism, sexuality, and relationships, we are concerned how the Incarnation of Jesus interrupts our field of vision, especially in viewing other bodies (skin) in light of Jesus becoming a body. My idea is to read Hegel and Fanon together in some way.

3. I want to write a book called, Why the Divinity of Jesus Does(n’t) Matter. My goal is primarily to view Jesus’ divinity as an idol –  a scapegoat to patch our misunderstanding – for the modern believer, and approach his humanity as primary.  I want to read Hegel’s death of God in the Incarnation as a humanistic approach of empowerment. This will be way down the road, and may never happen.

4. I really want to try to think about something else than Hegel. You can see this reflected in my first 3 points. . .

5. I can wait to read Jim Butcher’s latest addition to the Dresden Files, Cold Days. Harry Dresden returns from the dead!!!!!

6.  I also would love to read more Alain Badiou. Shout out to Hollis Phelps for introducing me to Badiou.

Thats all folks. Hopefully I will have time to post some more intellectual things very soon. Until next time, I would love to hear what you are interested in and where my interests intersect with yours. 

I Can Read Your Mind . . . I Think: Hegel on Cognition and Community

Tags

, , , , , , ,

I thought it fitting to title this post as such due to the fact that I am dealing with cognition and community. So it is fitting to include both you and me, as well as words like “mind” and “think.” However, I cannot actually read your mind (spoilers!). But philosophically, this does not mean that we are not interrelated and part of a distinct community. Let me explain.

G.W.F Hegel states in his Phenomenology of the Spirit that,

If cognition is like an instrument or medium, then it does not leave the item to which it is applied, or the thing it filters, unaffected. If so, then anything we know is known in virtue of its being modified by this instrument or medium. (p. 46)

In short (if that is even possible with Hegel), the way we gain truth or gain consciousness, whether about ourselves or things in the world, cannot be separated from how we experience those things. Our very act of observing, talking, or interacting with things affects what (or who) they are. Therefore, seeing something in itself is not possible without taking in how you came to see that object in the first place, or why you see object in that manner. For example, the experience of seeing a tree is intrinsic to what the nature of the tree is. What the tree is in itself is made up what it actually is and how I interact with it. Hegel, at least in my reading, conveys that interconnectedness of things, attempting to refine and redefine the way we come to know truth.

What does this mean for humanity and the attempt to build a community of people? Hegel suggests that the human can “experience itself as living, and can experience the world that situates it as a dimension of its own life and as comprised of [other] living things (De Nys, Hegel and Theology, 19).” That is to say that you and I are interrelated, and that I can, in some way, know who I am through my experience and interaction with you – my consciousness is know through our experience with one another and vice versa or my consciousness is that experience. I am conscious of my identity only through you.

This all goes to say that it may be very important to be a part of a community of people who are continually experiencing one another and (re)forming their identities. Whether this takes place in a church, a home, or at a weekly Sabbath meal (my favorite), relationships with others are vital to knowing one’s self.

Although there are several layers to Hegel’s claims on consciousness, it seems that, in some weird way, I can read your mind, or at least what your mind is is formed by me in some way.

What is the Task of Systematic Theology?

Tags

, , , , ,

What is the task of Systematic Theology?

What a wonderful and complex question; one that I am struggling with at this present moment. As I read in preparation for my first Christian Theology Class, I am struck (and instructed to review) by this question.

One of my sources thinks that the task of systematic theology is to “figure out what Christianity stands for in the world” (Emery, Jesus, Humanity and the Trinity, xiii). But are we not skipping a very systematic and important question when we agree with the above quote. Why does our discussion start with taking Christianity at face value, leaving the Christian faith uninterrogated and to be foundational for our conclusions? Should we not question the authority that we are attempting to posit as our foundational lenses through which we will see our task and make our decisions?

So, maybe we should back up and frame our question from a different perspective: not “how does Christianity help me make and inform my decisions?,” but rather ”why is Christianity worthy of giving authority to the decision-making process in the first place?”

What do you think the task of Systematic Theology is, or the task of theology in general? Please comment!

On the Beaten Path: Living in a City where being “like everyone else” is a Good Thing.

Tags

I come from a town where it hurts to be different. Most high schoolers dress the same, food tastes the same no matter where you go, and every road is indistinguishable from the other unless you have lived there your entire life. Even if you have often traveled those boring roads, your still not getting anywhere. I guess it is a cool place to live; for me, it is a love hate relationship.

Since moving to Durham, a place where you can be anyone you want (not so much because there is more freedom, but because most people don’t notice or care who you are), I have noticed that, in certain places, it is cool to be like everyone else.

As I was taking an afternoon jog a few days ago, I noticed that there are several paths made in the grass from runners and bikers. Most of the time I try to stick to the sidewalk, but there is a about a 1/2 a mile distance where the sidewalk ends and the beaten path begins. So, as a smart person, I follow these paths made by the thousands of feet who have run before me to adventure and avoid death by moving vehicle. That is when I started to think that following and being like others in this city may not be so bad.

First of all, this would never happen where I grew up. Literally speaking, these type of beaten paths do not exist. Next to no one runs in my hometown, and if you are seen running, there is a chance that you are either being chased by something and/or everyone in the neighborhood will think you are in some type of trouble (based on a true story). Secondly, Durham is situated within the health capital of the world. It’s always a good idea to follow the lead of those healthier than you, whether it is dealing with their faith or bodily health. Also, Durham portrays a place where opinions are valued, fundamentalism is challenged, and ideologies are at least called into question by most. These are good things to imitate and apply to one’s own life, no matter who you are or where you live.

Therefore, my goal has become to always follow those beaten paths made by the runners of Durham. Maybe one day, when I am better fit, I will make some of those paths myself. No matter where your sidewalk ends, have the courage to step off it and follow the beaten path. Just make sure that path has been made by able feet.

“The Recovering Redneck”

Tags

, , , , ,

After reading Shane Claiborne‘s Irresistible Revolution in which Claiborne calls himself a “recovering redneck,” I am very dear to the fact that I, myself am mending my own redneck ways. I used to drive a big, loud truck, wore the occasional camouflage, and could hang with the best in the category of “best southern accent.” Although these things are part of my geography and heritage of which I am semi-proud, I have tried my hardest to be myself in a culture where “branching out” means trimming the limbs off a tree so you can have a better view from the deer stand. The last few year I have been standing on tetter-totter between redneck and normal; between v-necks and wranglers; boots and Toms; ain’t and is not. Do not get me wrong: I have lots of friends who are rednecks and I love them the same, but usually the title redneck portrays a cookie-cutter identity that is more a cover than an actual expression of who the person is; a way to fit in when often the Wranglers are just too tight (subtle redneck joke #1).

Although I have made leaps and bounds on my journey to recovery, this last week has made me rethink how much I have actually progressed. I moved to Durham last Wednesday, thinking I was prepared to move to the big city from a very small town, my home, Newton Grove, NC. I was very wrong. After putting my shopping cart in the wrong lane at Harris Tetter, I felt a sudden anxiety that I was in over my head. Then it got worse. My wife, Camille, and I have done quite a bit of adventuring since we arrived in Durham. Along the way I have noticed how hard it is to get used to stop lights when you grow up in a town that has none, and you do your undergrad at a place that really only has one. Yeah, I have almost ran six or seven stop lights because I simply do not notice them. I can haul heavy machinery, navigate large trucks, and back long trailers into narrow spaces, but I obviously cannot tell the difference between the two basic colors of red and green.

This may be the first time in my life I have felt like the outsider. Whether it is my naïve ways, my “innocence”, as Camille calls it, or simply my redneck self looking for attention, Durham still feels like some foreign place in a dream from which I havent yet awoken.

Maybe the answer is to embrace my Redneckness. Maybe time will heal all shotgun wounds (subtle redneck joke #2). Who knows? Either way, I am here for the next two years. So Durham, watch out, this redneck is here to stay.

Church as the “Bane” of my Existence: Christian Reflection on “The Dark Knight Rises”

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

“Have we started a fire?,” says the petty henchman. Bane responds, “Yes, the fire rises.”

In the wake of one of the biggest movies to ever grace the big screen, I have a dire need to reflect on what “The Dark Knight Rises” (TDKR) has to say to the modern church in all of its capitalistic glory. Even if you were half asleep while watching TDRK, director and writer Christopher Nolans’ bold critique of capitalism shines brightly. Bearing several allusions to the Occupy Wall Street movement, Nolan lays out a ill-fated conclusion to The Dark Knight trilogy, and, in Catwoman’s words, the fate of a culture who “wonders how [the rich] ever thought [they] could live so large, and leave so little for the rest of us.”

Obviously, Nolan is speaking to more than just comic book nerds and black leather enthusiast, in Catwoman’s case; Nolan is most definitely juggling political motifs in a time where film has become more about entertainment than portraying a particular cultural message. And this message is clear. So clear that the fire is being kindled by Rush Limbaugh himself. Rush said that Bane, Batman’s adversary in the movie, was a heavy allusion to Mitt Romney in reference to his former company, Bain Capital. Nolan has refuted this claim, but hey, anytime Romney is made to look any more corrupt than he already seems, it has to be a good thing.

Now, can we make a connection to the Christianity? Is there a sturdy bridge on which we can walk from Wall Street to the church?***

It is no secret that churches and church organizations are highly capitalistic. Sure, they are tax exempt and claim to be a part of a different kingdom, but rarely does a church budget reflected anything but a capitalistic enterprise that feeds off money and money alone. If the budget is not enough, the competition between churches and their superstar pastors look strikingly similar to the competition between major retailers and companies. There are catchy slogans, personal attacks, and quarterly numbers that most definitely permeate both the church and the private sector.

This capitalism hits home with me as an aspiring pastor, educator, and church member. I see the effects of capitalism every Sunday. This problem is even more real to me due to the fact that my home church is slowly dying because the budget, the pastor-main-attraction, and the involved members are not up to par in the eyes of the capitalistic monster hiding under the pew that subtly influences everything. But how do we deal with these problems? How do we save a dying church stricken by capitalism in a once anti-capitalism religion?

In TDKR, Bane’s answer is to start a fire that consumes, burns down, and renews Western civilization. The church sits as the false idol at the foundation of Western civilization, tempting the world to be better when, at the churches most basic level, it still chooses to participate and even facilitate corrupt capitalism itself.

Maybe the only way to save our churches is to let them burn as Bane suggests; to let them die in the hopes that in their ashes we can practice the core of our faith: resurrection.

I am not sure if Jesus’s role is more like that of Batman or Bane. I am also not sure if chaos and death, or patience and fidelity are the answers to the churches problems. What I am sure of is there is a problem, and movies like “The Dark Knight Rises” provides a canvas on which we can all paint the problems and flawed solutions of our culture.

***interesting fact: Christian Bale played both Batman and Jesus? Coincidence? I think not!

Please join the conversation by leaving comments below, or emailing me personally at joshuacbarfield@gmail.com.   

It Pays to be Lazy: Cheers to an Inactive Gaming Lifestyle

lazy-gamer.jpg

I am an avid gamer. I am also an avid, lazy gamer. Having said that, over the last few years, motion technology has revolutionized gaming across the planet. First with the Wii, then with Xbox Kinect and Playstation Move, it seems that “active” would become a part of the everyday gaming jargon. However, according to this new study from Reuters Health, “active gamers” who use motion technology tend to consume twice the calorie intake than inactive gamers, with the calories burned from playing motion games included.

I having been playing video games since I was six years old. I have owned a regular Nintendo, Super Nintendo, Nintendo 64, Playstation 1, 2, and 3, as well as my currently owned, Xbox 360. My gaming experience with all my consoles was and are, as they should be, experienced from the couch.

So cheers to lazy gaming; sometimes it pays to sit and do nothing.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,057 other followers